Central Effects of GLP-1 Analogues
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Yesterday, I discussed how part of the improvements in type 2 diabetes patients after gastric bypass surgery may be due to increased postprandial release of GLP-1.
However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that GLP-1 also exerts central effects on hunger and satiety, and perhaps even affects the desire for certain foods.
Therefore, not surprisingly, GLP-1 analogues, while already available for treating diabetes, are currently being investigated for the treatment of obesity.
This topic was recently reviewed by Torekov and colleagues from the University of Denmark, in a paper published in Obesity Reviews.
As the authors note, GLP-1 receptors are expressed in many regions of the brain and in particular in the arcuate nucleus and other hypothalamic regions involved in the regulation of food intake. Animal studies have confirmed that GLP-1’s has central effects on hunger and satiety that are independent of its peripheral effects on glucose metabolism.
However, whether peripherally injected GLP-1 actually makes it into the human brain, as suggested by some animal studies, is still a matter of debate. It is also possible that some of the effects of GLP-1 agonists on food intake may be mediated by interaction with sensory afferent neurones of the vagus nerves in the gastrointestinal tract.
The notion that GLP-1 analogues may affect feeding even when they do not enter the brain is supported by studies showing that large molecular size GLP-1 receptor agonists (albumin-conjugated GLP-1 receptor agonists), that cannot cross the blood-brain barrier can inhibit feeding in both humans and mice.
Thus, it appears that GLP-1 analogues may affect feeding behaviour both through central and peripheral effects.
As a side note, it may be of interest that while the ‘hunger hormone’ ghrelin appears to counteract (or rather override) the effects of GLP-1 on satiety, the commonly used anti-diabetic drug metformin appears to increase expression of GLP-1 receptors and enhance GLP-1 secretion and sensitivity in both rodents and humans.
Currently, the long-acting GLP-1 analogues exenatide and liraglutide are being investigated as potential anti-obesity drugs, with early indications that this may indeed be worthwhile.
Thus, for example, as noted by the authors, in one study with liraglutide, obese subjects in the quartile of greatest weight loss had a mean weight loss of 18 kg with 3.0 mg of liraglutide compared with only 9 kg on placebo.
Overall, the authors conclude that:
“The recognition that several gastrointestinal hormones, released in response to nutritional stimuli are important regulators of appetite (PYY, oxyntomodulin, GLP-1 and decreased secretion of ghrelin), offers a strategy for the development of more effective ant-iobesity agents….treatment of obesity could involved a combination of hormones, e.g. GLP-1, PYY, and/or oxyntomodulin to produce a superior appetite suppressing hormone profile that may result in a weight loss far exceeding that seen in single-agent trials. Using several hormones in low doses and incorporating lifestyle interventions might maximize the clinical effect while minimizing the side effects.”
Clearly, many patients would find daily injections of hormones preferable to undergoing bariatric surgery, even if these injections would need to be continued in the long-term to keep the weight off.
Wether or not such injections would in the end also prove cost-effective will remain to be seen.
AMS
London, UK
Disclosure: I am a consultant to Novo-Nordisk and involved in studies with liraglutide.
Torekov SS, Madsbad S, & Holst JJ (2011). Obesity – an indication for GLP-1 treatment? Obesity pathophysiology and GLP-1 treatment potential. Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 12 (8), 593-601 PMID: 21401851
Thursday, September 29, 2011
If I’m reading this correctly, this assumes that people become fat because they eat “too much” and don’t know when to stop eating. It also assumes that cutting appetite, and therefore cutting caloric intake, is going to result in weight loss. While that may happen in the short term, what are the long-term effects of this therapy? Is the weight loss maintained, or is the weight lost regained at some point in the future? Was any follow-up done to see if the weight loss was maintained and for how long it was maintained?
Knowing how stubborn our bodies are about hanging onto fat stores, and slowing metabolism when they perceive a famine (dieting), I don’t see this as being any more effective than any other intervention, in the long term.
Friday, November 4, 2011
After reading different research articles I have formed this concept:
1. Umami taste buds (CD36) sends signal through vagus nerve to the pre ventricular D2 dopamine receptor cells. Efferent signals through vagus nerve send signals to activate the gut hormones gherkin, cholecystokinin, GLP-1 etc.
2. GLP-1 agonists activate the GLP-1 receptor of these, increase glucose transport through Glu-2 transporter, thus increase survival of these cells (I.e. Decrease apoptosis). I have been using Victoza with Cycloset in diabetic & stage 2 pre diabetic patients with Comorbidities (e.g. Alzheimer’s with poor appetite & sleep disturbance, patient also on Antidepressants, Hypogonadism esp in young diabetics whom I don’t want to decrease their sperm count. There seems to be more weight loss with this combination.
3. I am seeing more articles on Neuro-endohormones and brain cells producing renin & other hormones, and having multiple receptors. I wonder if this concept is possible: the brain (like Pentagon) has it’s own environment whereby it maintain it’s cholesterol and cell repair, creates multiple neurotransmitters, sets it own “thermostat” or autonomic function; but accepts signals through baroreceptor Carotid bodies, RAAS from kidney and adrenal as secondary servo-mechanism to fine tune body control.