Follow me on

Breaking a Lance For Obesity Management



In case regular readers of these pages are wondering why my posts this week are coming from Acapulco, Mexico, it is because I have been invited to attend and speak at the Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad Mexicana de Nutricion y Endocrinolgia.

Not only did I have the pleasure of meeting several Mexican colleagues working in the area of obesity, but I was also particularly interested to follow the often sophisticated discussions around managing excess weight and its metabolic consequences.

Notably, as always happens in sessions that deal with obesity management in adults, there were a few colleagues in the audience, who took the opportunity to raise two important points:

1) Rather than discussing obesity treatments, we should be talking about obesity prevention

and

2) Rather than discussing obesity treatments in adults, we should be talking about obesity treatment in kids.

Both points are of course important and indisputable but are unfortunately often presented as an “alternative” to managing adult obesity.

The commenters literally (and often with considerable passion) seem to imply that treating adult obesity is a waste of time (and resources) and the only reasonable use of this time (and resources) is to either spend it on obesity prevention (e.g. teaching people healthy lifestyles and promoting physical activity) or on treating kids (the earlier the better).

Not seldom (as was the case here in Acapulco), the audience responds favourably to such comments with clapping and cheering.

This is where I believe lies the problem.

To be clear, I am all for preventing obesity and certainly there is much to be said for improving the lifestyles of our kids. But nowhere do I see either of these activities as an “alternative” to increasing resources and efforts to actually treating obesity in adults.

From a pure cost-effectiveness standpoint, there is no question that obesity management in adults pays substantial dividends – particularly when such efforts are focused on individuals who already have obesity related comorbidities.

For e.g., as outlined in considerable detail in the recent UK FORESIGHT report (see figure), while reducing BMI by 4 units in obese people 20 years of age or older would immediately start saving health care spending, efforts to prevent or treat obesity in 6-10 year olds would not only cost billions of pounds but would also have virtually no impact on health care spending well into 2040.

Similar timelines were suggested for other population-based prevention efforts as outlined in the recent WHO/OECD report “Improving Lifestyles, Tackling Obesity: The Health and Economic Impact of Prevention Strategies”.

But this is not simply a question of cost-effectiveness.

Indeed, for the millions of adults who are currently obese, this is not just a matter of health care dollars. Excess weight affects their self-image, their quality of life, and often their very livelihood, all of which ultimately limits their ability to providing a healthy and nurturing environment for their kids.

Not providing obese adults with access to obesity treatments simply means abandoning them (and their children) to a life of complications and frustrations – this cannot be good for society, this cannot be good for future generations.

Healthcare dollars are limited and the cost-effectiveness argument is not one to be simply discarded. Indeed, as outlined in the WHO/OECD report, it is not at all clear that a dollar spent on prevention provides more return-on-investment (at least in the short term) than spending that same dollar on actually treating someone who has the problem.

But even if obesity treatment was not all that cost-effective, do we really want to simply shrug our shoulders at people struggling with excess weight and look the other way. Would that not simply be a reflection of the ideological bias that stereotypes obese people as having gained weight by choice and thus having brought their misery upon themselves – ergo, undeserving of our help?

It is usually at this point in the discussion, when someone points out that even if we wanted to, we simply do not have the money in the health care budget to begin providing obesity treatments to millions.

This is nonsense! As long as we can continue finding the money to treat the complications of obesity ranging from diabetes to heart attacks, from back pain to joint replacements, from sleep apnea to gall bladder disease, from infertility to colorectal cancers, we need to ask ourselves how much of this money could be better used to treat obesity – the primary cause of most of these problems.

If conservative estimates assume that obesity related chronic diseases in Canada consume even just 6% of the total health care budget (I actually believe this number to be far greater), then what proportion of these 6% is a reasonable amount to spend on treating obesity itself?

Just to throw out a number – 6% of the total annual health care budget of Alberta (~$10 billion) would amount to about $600 million. What proportion of this money could be more effectively used to simply treating obesity – thereby avoiding both the medical and societal consequences of excess weight?

Obviously, we cannot simply stop treating the consequences of obesity and suddenly put all this money towards obesity treatments – but at what point do we perhaps decide to start “tweaking off” some of this money towards actually treating obesity rather than just continuing to spend ever increasing amounts on treating its consequences?

Could a reasonable goal be to chip off just 5% of the money currently being spent for treating obesity related problems to actually treat obesity itself?

Imagine what could be done for obesity treatment across the province with just $30 Million – a sum that, in a $10 billion annual health care budget, represents little more than a rounding error (0.003% of the total budget)!

None of this means we should not also invest in prevention or should not also put more efforts into treating childhood overweight and obesity.

However, as I pointed out to my Mexican colleagues, not providing treatments for adult obesity is an option that no health care system can afford.

AMS
Acapulco, Mexico

4 Comments

  1. What they do is NOT treat adults for any obesity related illness and save that money too. Who cares about fat people, it’s their own fault they’re sick, why should we pay to treat them? THAT’s the attitude out there. When I complain about osteoarthritis, I get told to lose weight. Maybe that makes some sense for my knee, but what about my hands?? I don’t do any weight bearing activities with them (thank god, because they hurt like hell). I have fatigue (exercise, lose weight), I have full body pain especially after exertion (lose weight). So I get it! Lose weight. Righto. Got a plan for that doc? One that doesn’t involve hundreds of dollars too, because I’m poor on top of it all. Everyone (including me) wants me to lose weight and NOBODY has a plan. I went to the local Health Unit for help (as Public Health declared obesity the no. 1 public health issue) and they looked at me like I had two heads. And no, sorry, they didn’t have any plan, or program. Would I like a copy of the Food Guide? ARGHGHGHGH!!!
    It’s apparent to me, that I’ve been fat my whole life and I’ll likely die fat but after a few years of abuse in the ‘Home’ because I’m too fat for nurses to help me. Great future. Thanks for listening. If, in fact, you did.

    Post a Reply
  2. Dear Dr. Sharma,

    I very much enjoy reading your posts. I agree that prevention is the key, but this will take time. In the interim agree that treatments are necessary to prevent as “excess weight affects their self-image, their quality of life, and often their very livelihood, all of which ultimately limits their ability to providing a healthy and nurturing environment for their kids”.

    We have had many clients who have managed to loss the weight but suffer from the ongoing problems with self-image. This is often a combination of both phychological and physical reminders of the past. I have been fortunate to see how we have been able to support and make a small different to some of our clients at some level in this industry. Often post surgery to remove excess skin is so expensive that it is just not an option for most. Fortunately we have over the past 7 years been able to find great international hospitals and surgeons that perform this at drastically reduced pricing.

    As one of my consultants was also obese and went through some extensive post weight loss surgery, she now travels in Australia and New Zealand to provide support to those that still struggle with body image issues!

    Thanks and I Look forward to your next post!

    Post a Reply
  3. Doctors “treat” obesity (they think successfully) all the time, with medically supervised fasts, WLS, etc. People lose weight. The problem is that there is virtually NO recognition that maintenance is its own complicated bailiwick, that requires a relationship between patient and doctor that is based in support, not judgment. Instead, we patients get the message loud and clear — we are compliant (good) or not (bad). Changes in our weight are assumed to tell tales about our moral status, and if what we say disagrees with what our body weight indicates, we are presumed liars (in addition to being “bad”).

    Many people are likely going AWOL from their doctors (as do many research subjects from obesity studies). They do it quietly. They doctor shop, move their patronage without having their records forwarded. Is this promoting health? I think it’s a big stinking blue elephant in the room that no one dare discuss.

    Meanwhile, simplistic mainstream magazines tell weight-reduced people that if they regain weight, they are emotionally broken, lazy, weak-willed or lack a supportive family. (So more people may feel like failures! How delightful.) With the imprimatur of the scientific community, they are told they have FAILED to “maintain behaviors” (as the NWCR is quick to point out).

    Sadly, empirical research shows us that as high as 97% of people will regain lost weight.

    Maintainers need suportive doctors who accept that maintenance is rare and difficult. Until doctors become helpful (which will require much more time commitment than they are willing to make), there really will be NO long-term treatment for obesity. Doctors need to be on the forefront of acknowledging the complexity of maintenance as biological puzzle, endocrine dilemma and cultural mine field. Instead, they are content to advance a horrible, simplistic cultural mythology regarding weight control.

    Post a Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. La cantidad de tejido adiposo es igual de importante que la masa corporal en la lucha contra la obesidad « RDi Press - [...] Breaking a Lance For Obesity Management (drsharma.ca) // Noticias relacionadasDetectan un ciclón de más de cinco años de vida…

Leave a Reply to Rachel Rowling Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.