Follow me on

Bariatric Care: Weighing in on Waiting Lists



sharma-obesity-waiting-timeThe first arm of the APPLES study, a prospective parallel group study to evaluate outcomes in a publicly funded population based bariatric program, now published by Raj Padwal and colleagues in Medical Care, looked at weight and health indicators in wait-listed patients.

When APPLES study was initiated in 2008, approximately 1,500 adults were wait-listed for clinic entry with an average wait time of two years.

To get on the waiting list, eligible patients (BMI greater than 35) had to be referred to the bariatric centre by their primary medical practitioner through a central referral service.

Wait-listed patients were advised to attend communitybased group education sessions before clinic entry but otherwise received no specific intervention.

During the 24 months of the APPLES study, structural changes to the program and increased clinic capacity resulted in a shortening of waiting times.

Thus, out of the 150 participants enrolled into the wait-list group, 93 (62%) were seen in the clinic before the end of the 24-month study period. Another 18 (12%) wait-listed subjects dropped out of the study. As a result, complete 24-month follow-up data was only available for 38 (26%) of individuals in this arm of the study.

At 24 months (using a last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) approach for individuals who dropped out or were no longer on the waiting list), the absolute and relative (% of baseline) mean weight losses were 1.5 kg (0.9%) in the wait-listed group.

While this may seem modest, about one in six participants (17%) achieved a 5% weight-loss, while one in ten (9%) achieved a 10% weight loss at 24 months (or at the time of attrition).

Conversely, about one in eight (13%) of wait-listed participants gained more than 5% during their time on the waiting list.

No significant overall changes in health status were noted during this time.

Thus, this arm of the APPLES study provides some very important insights into what happens to bariatric patients on waiting lists (with the important caveat that waiting times were considerably less than the 24 months anticipated at the commencement of the study).

1) The vast majority of wait-listed patients are weight stable.

2) A roughly equal number of wait-listed patients will experience a clinically significant (5%) weight loss or weight gain (17 vs 13%).

3) During this 1.5 to 2 year waiting period, the overall burden of cardiovascular disease remains about the same.

While health system experts and policy makers may well see this outcome as support for the notion that a 12 or even 24 month waiting time to receive tertiary care bariatric services may well be justifiable, it is important to note that this may be viewed very differently by the folks actually on the waiting list.

I have previously posted insights into how patients in the APPLES study felt about their time on the waiting list.

The majority of subjects expressed concern over wait times (65%) and felt that waiting was very stressful (53%) and physically, emotionally and mentally taxing (62%).

According to the wait-list impact questionnaire, 47% of subjects agreed or strongly agreed that waiting affected their quality of life, 65% described wait times as ‘concerning’ and 81% as ‘frustrating’, 73% worried about the consequences of extended wait times on their health, 68% were frustrated with the allocation of resources and 59% felt that they should not have to wait for obesity treatment.

Surprisingly, however, only 31% were dissatisfied/very dissatisfied with their overall medical care.

This is in line with finding in wait listed bariatric patients in other parts of Canada.

It appears that bariatric patients are overall a very patient and “accepting” crowd – or perhaps just very “Canadian”.

@DrSharam
Edmonton, AB

ResearchBlogging.orgPadwal RS, Rueda-Clausen CF, Sharma AM, Agborsangaya CB, Klarenbach S, Birch DW, Karmali S, McCargar L, & Majumdar SR (2013). Weight Loss and Outcomes in Wait-listed, Medically Managed, and Surgically Treated Patients Enrolled in a Population-based Bariatric Program: Prospective Cohort Study. Medical care PMID: 24374423

.

5 Comments

  1. My experience during the ‘wait time’ included a constant barrage of warnings from the nursing/social work/dieticians that if I was to gain any weight during the wait time, I would likely be postponed from surgery, indeed even be put out of the process as “weight gain indicates you’re not committed to the process”. So sure, I didn’t gain any weight – and got approved for surgery – but the two years was hellish in nature. The dietician was amazing, helping me put some new practices in place and keeping them despite how difficult it was. Surgery has made eating like a ‘normal’ person normal. Without the sense of deprivation and hunger I suffered during the two years leading up to surgery.
    Let’s not forget that my referral got ‘lost’ for a year prior to that. So ya, the process is ‘frustrating’ at best.
    Thanks for listening.

    Post a Reply
  2. @Sandy – thanks for the comment – not sure though what wait time you are referring to because while on the waiting list to be seen in the clinic you would have had no contact to the nurses/social workers/dietitians in the clinic. Perhaps you are referring to the “waiting time” within the clinic after having gone through the “medical part” of the program?

    Post a Reply
  3. Dr Sharma, your article indicates that clients were advised to attend Community programming, but it does not state whether or not they attended. Is there any connection betwee weight gain/loss and attending community programming?

    Post a Reply
    • Great question Shelley – this is actually part of another study that is currently looking at the effectiveness of these community education classes and whether or not they influence long term outcomes.

      Post a Reply
  4. With respect to the attitude of health professionals, employers, the general public, etc., towards persons suffering from obesity, Alberta–and the entire “civilized” world, for that matter–is in serious need of an attitude makeover. Spending one’s entire life being unjustly criticised for one’s body size and adjudged as being the agent of one’s body size are simply untrue, unacceptable, and personally deleterious. Health professionals are in dire need of evidence-based information including more than correlational studies. As Teuber’s dictum says: “Absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence.”

    Thank you, Dr. Sharma, for your contribution to bettering the lot of those of us whose body size exceeds that of socially-defined & socially-acceptable norms.

    Post a Reply

Leave a Reply to VC Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *